Monday, February 23, 2026

Judkins Park and I-90: Based on analysis, the recommended alternative is Alternative 2!

By: April Delchamps

What a game! The Seahawks are the Super Bowl Champions!

A crowd of people dressed in green and blue holding Seattle Seahawks flags.
Congratulations to the Seahawks!

We also have another milestone. The I-90 Judkins Park Station – Reconnecting Communities Study team has a recommendation for the Interstate 90 ramps at Rainier Avenue South. After months of coordination, traffic modeling and analysis, we are recommending Alternative 2.

A map of Judkins Park area and the existing on-ramps and on-ramps, indicated by color coded numbers.
Map of Judkins Park area with the on-ramp and off-ramps.  

Alternative 2: the recommended alternative

: This image shows the preferred alternative selected by the project team. It removes the westbound I-90 to northbound Rainier Avenue South off-ramp and reroutes traffic to a different ramp.  More details in text below.
Alternative 2 removes the westbound I-90 to northbound Rainier off-ramp (Ramp 4) and reroutes traffic to Ramp 5. (This option used to be called Concept 2 from the 2019 SDOT study.)

Here’s what could change with Alternative 2:

  • Removes one of the I-90 ramps, Ramp #4 (westbound to northbound off-ramp). This traffic will be moved to Ramp #5.
  • Adds a pedestrian signal crossing Rainier Avenue South, just north of I-90.
  • Reduces Rainier Avenue South from six lanes to four lanes under I-90 (one vehicle lane and one dedicated bus lane in each direction). This will allow more space for bikes and pedestrians under I-90. Note: Any changes to Rainier Avenue South under I-90 will be developed in consultation with the Seattle Department of Transportation, community and agency partners. That includes any changes to the number and type of lanes and the bike and pedestrian facilities. These changes can only happen if there is more funding to design and construct the improvements identified in this study.
  • Improves the separation between vehicle and non-vehicle traffic.
  • "Tees up" Ramp #2 (northbound to eastbound on-ramp).
  • "Tees up" Ramps #3 (southbound to eastbound on-ramp) and Ramp #5 (westbound to southbound off-ramp) at one controlled intersection (traffic signal or roundabout) near Bush Place. 

"Tee-ing up" a ramp

Tee-ing up a ramp means creating T-shaped intersections with traffic signals or roundabouts. Vehicles must slow down and stop, creating controlled crossings for pedestrians and bikes to cross the ramp

Alternative 2 is the best value

We evaluated the performance of all four alternatives on the seven criteria.

Alternative 2 is the winner with the best performance at a relatively low cost. It’s the top performing choice in these criteria:

  • Improvement to access for people walking, biking and using transit
  • Reducing people’s exposure to vehicles
  • Slowing down vehicles using the on- and off-ramps
  • Improving the spacings of crosswalks on Rainier Avenue South
  • Minimizing queuing on I-90 off ramps

It scores second best on:

  • adding parks and green space in the area
  • reducing impacts to transit speed and reliability

Overall, Alternative 2 scored the best across all seven criteria when we added them all up. That means improved conditions for people who walk, roll and bike, while reducing vehicle speeds. This alternative also:

  • enhances safety
  • provides more space for people to move through the area
  • improves access to the new light rail station
  • supports transit

If you live, visit, shop, work or own a business

Everyone can walk, roll, bike, take the bus or drive to access home, work, services, destinations and more. Things like better transit access, sidewalks and bike lanes mean that everyone has more options to travel.

  • Walk, roll, or bike: More dedicated space. Better connections to light rail. Bike facilities. Improved sidewalks and crossings.
  • Take the bus: Dedicated bus lanes mean more reliable arrival times and better connections to light rail.
  • Drive: Two lanes (one lane in each direction). Access to residences, local businesses and services is maintained. Expect some traffic congestion during rush hour.

What happens next

Just as the Seahawks prepare for next season, our project team is developing the game plan for Alternative 2. This spring and summer, we'll work with SDOT, King County Metro, Sound Transit, the Federal Highway Administration and other partners to verify and refine the details of Alternative 2. After that, we'll:

  • Finalize and document the study recommendation
  • Develop a report
  • Start our preliminary design along with the Advisory Group, community and agency partners

Our I-90 Judkins Park Station – Reconnecting Communities is only funded through preliminary design. More funding is needed to finish design and construction.

This is a team effort

The Seahawks rely on players, coaches and the 12s all working together. Alternative 2 represents collaboration between the WSDOT, Judkins Park community and other agencies. It also includes everyone who has helped by engaging in the Study. We’ll spend the next few months engaging with agency partners, submitting documentation and advancing the alternative design. We’re excited to engage the community and the advisory group on the preliminary design later this year. Thank you for being part of this process. And go Hawks!

A person wearing blue and green Seattle Seahawks hat, with a Seahawks 12th Man flag.
Go Hawks!

Study webpage: I-90 Judkins Park Station – Reconnecting Communities

Email updates: Sign up for Seattle area news and study updates.

Contact:

Amber Stanley - Community Engagement Lead
Phone: 206-817-8833
Email: amber.stanley@wsdot.wa.gov


2 comments:

mikehndrsn said...

I don't understand the reasoning for reducing the number of lanes on Rainier through there at all. The reason given is for "more room for bikes" but there is already a bike path on the west side of the street that runs past the station entrance. And the east side is plenty wide to add a similar pathway if that were desired. I bike through here occasionally, but generally it makes a lot more sense to use the bike lane on MLK and use the I-90 trail to get to the Judkins station or points West (for bikers). Adding a bike lane to Rainier isn't going to entice me to ever ride my bike down Rainier...too many driveways and turns to get hooked...I ride to work most days and am totally comfortable riding in traffic...but I would never ride down Rainier. And ...the slower that road gets the angrier drivers are going to be (which is more dangerous for bikers also) and it is already untenable heading North since the Bus lane was added. All the other aspects of this alternative seem like good improvements...though it will be critical to synchronize the light cycles at Bush, I-90 offramp, and Massachusetts St - it is already problematic with the existing signals. i also worry about WSDOT wanting to prioritize signal time for traffic turning from I-90 offramps to keep traffic from backing up onto the main line, resulting in a perpetual traffic jam on Rainier in both directions and that gets even worse with only 1 lane of though traffic in each direction.

Josh said...

By eliminating the northbound exit ramp to Rainier -- which has a pedestrian underpass - and forcing all vehicle traffic to the other side greatly increases pedestrian and vehicle conflict

WSDOT comment policy

Post a Comment